
Part 1: Why I'm Thinking About This Stuff So Seriously
I was asked by Greg Lucero (it's a little odd knowing whether to say "a friend" with Greg, so I clarify by saying his name) what it is that I want. This is in the context of attending the
UVU RSU meetings. Greg, of course, said it in some foreign language with a background relating to some philosopher (I was quite tired when he asked, so I don't remember the details. The way he asked it sounded like "chez-vous," but that wasn't it).
So, why am I attending revolutionary student union meetings? Why, especially when I claim a capitalist stance?
I paused, and replied with: "Honestly? To convert myself."
This is a great part of the truth, but it seems somewhat insufficient, so I think I'll give a wee bit of a peek further, for the benefit of any RSU buddies I've got on here, and anyone else who's been curious. (I know I've slated a lot of you for conversations with me about capitalism/communism).
It started like this. Once upon a time, way back, I decided it would be interesting to learn more about communism. That simmered pleasantly in the back of my mind, on an unwritten to do list, until I got more opportunities to discuss it. The very beginning was one Mykle Law, a friend from highschool, who was not a communist - merely anti-corporate (and to a much lesser degree, anti-capitalist in general). He basically talked to me about how he felt marketing was evil.
Why yes, I am the marketing director of my company. Thanks for asking.
I debated with him, on behalf of capitalism, on these chats. And suddenly, there was this public debate that came up, and Myke invited me to debate in favor of Capitalism against one Gregory Lucero.
The debate was interesting, and fun (I love debate). It allowed me an opportunity to think through why I felt strongly about Capitalism, and do some basic research into Communism. It got my mind started on a couple of trains of thought as to the abuses within the Capitalist system. But after the debate, I simply left it on the back burner once more.
Then, some time (months) later, I got the opportunity to look further into things. As a part of this, I started having conversations with Lucero on Facebook, who is not merely a communist, but a violent revolutionary communist of the Marxist Lenninist Maoist tradition. (Hey, at least he's not a Stallinist - give him some credit). As I was frequently looking for excuses to stay up into the early hours of the morning, my discussions with Greg gave me an reason for that. Plus, intelligent conversation is a rare and valuable commodity. (See? I am a Capitalist. Even conversations with people are commodities. But we'll get more into this in a bit.)
People assume that I'm more of a capitalist than I really am, mostly because I claimed to be more of a capitalist than I really am (so, surprise surprise on that one). This is linked to the public debate I did, but also this fun definition of myself as a liberal independent capitalist vegan. Beyond that, there is a very solid reason I claimed Capitalism, and that's a loyalty to a very specific part of Capitalism. Business.
I am fiercely loyal to good business. When I gave the public debate, I talked about how Capitalism was the greatest form of democracy, with every dollar spent altering the market. That with every nickel and dime we invest in a product, we are voting for that product. That we, as a country, determine the value of products. That the market is an extension of the people. That beyond mere democracy, we were giving more reward to those who contributed more, thus motivating them to contribute more. Meritocracy and democracy, as brought about by spending, motivated good business.
Well, anywho, I kept having these late night conversations with Lucero. Beyond that, partially by coincidence, I found myself spending a significant amount of time with other communists. This is partially because I started attending RSU meetings, partially because of new people I met, and partially because, when I talked about these things, I found out that many of my existing friends were some brand of anti-Capitalist.
Though many of these individuals had an impact, one particularly had an ability to call me down on not citing sources, to know when I was exaggerating my own beliefs, and to state things in an incredibly simple way which made the abuses of Capitalism seem just obvious. This was quite eye-opening. In brief, I've been having communist/anti-capitalist conversations with not just one, but several, anti-capitalists.
In the course of this, I went to my first RSU meeting, on the subject of Mutualism and Mondragon (referenced in an earlier entry), and found it to be very educational (I was lucky enough to have been told in advance what it was about, and did some research, so I was able to ask quite a few questions that I'd been curious about earlier).
All of this finally settled into a conclusion. Capitalism is not the only way to achieve good business. Capitalism in its current form is insufficient. There are certain highly negative traits that are not merely a part of how we run Capitalism, but part of what Capitalism itself is.
Then, a second part of the conclusion. Communism may or may not be functional. Mutualism may or may not be functional. Socialism may or may not be functional. Basically anything might or might not be, but they bore looking into. If none of them were functional, or if no system currently exists to resolve the problems, then that system need to be created and perfected.
In other words, there's got to be something better.
Thus, my presence at the RSU meetings. To educate myself, and see if I can find something better - or at least think it through enough that I can make a system in my head that will work, something that I can believe in.
And I actually have come to quite a few conclusions. These will be shared in my next entry.